VPM-B oddity

[Robert Helling]

Rick,

> On 10 Sep 2015, at 20:26, Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The model assumes that deco starts at the last input point.  This is ok for a square profile dive.  But for a multi-level dive, especially with a deep bouncing, it doesn't make much sense.  I think a better assumption would be that the Boyle's ceiling be taken is the deepest ceiling at any point in the dive.  This gives very nearly the same result for a square profile dive, but in a multilevel dive such as your example, the decompression time would increase with the deep bounce, as one might expect.

I thought you had already sent a patch for this. BTW, the thread that I got the idea from to look at this was about MultiDeco which (due to a bug apparently) gets the bounce dive really wrong.

Best
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150910/791fd8b5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150910/791fd8b5/attachment.sig>