Re: Buehlmann / Buhlmann / Bühlmann

[Dirk Hohndel]

> On Sep 15, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Salvador Cuñat <salvador.cunat at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-09-15 23:33 GMT+02:00 Salvador Cuñat <salvador.cunat at gmail.com <mailto:salvador.cunat at gmail.com>>:
> Good night.
> 
> I remember that this was discussed some time ago, but can't remember if there was an agreement about it.
> 
> I've finally found the thread.
> Seems that there was an agreement about using "Buhlmann" as it is the most widely used in the web.  Then ... nobody used it  (specially in manual, where there is no occurrence for this, just Buehlmann and Bühlmann).

Back then we didn't want UTF-8 in our source and so went with Buhlmann. I'd be happy to simply change it everywhere to Bühlmann.
Any volunteer to patch this EVERYWHERE?

/D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150915/857e787f/attachment-0001.html>