stuck in deco calculations

[Robert Helling]

Hi,

> On 20 Sep 2015, at 07:46, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
> 
> But regardless how much I stare at this, I can't see why we have entries
> for 2005 and then 1996, so 33:25 and then 33:16.
> 
> The Uemis contains a sample at 33:25, but none at 33:16. And this happens
> when switching to the Atomics. So... hu???

I figured that what is special about 33:16 is that there is a sample with 0 depth at 33:17. When I delete all 0 depth samples from the Uemis, the problem goes away. My guess (so far unconfirmed is that some part of the code uses 0 depth as some kind of in band signalling…).

Best
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150920/cd31b72b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150920/cd31b72b/attachment.sig>