Retrospective gradient factors on real dives
Anton Lundin
glance at acc.umu.se
Sat Dec 10 11:40:24 PST 2016
On 10 December, 2016 - Robert Helling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Am 10.12.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Anton Lundin <glance at acc.umu.se>:
> >
> > My quick experiment showed that with 2s sample rate its just to much
> > noise to actually see anything. 10s sample rate isn't really there
> > either. I think the value needs some smoothing, like a running average
> > or something to make sense.
> >
> > I'm too tired to hack that up right now, but if you would like to do it,
> > be my guest.
>
> I continued on you experiment. I changed your code to
>
>
>
> Then I ListPlot these values in mathematica:
>
>
>
> I think this is quite an interesting plot (x axis is depth, y axis momentary gf) for one of my dives. Put it also shows that this is clearly not linear, not even the last bit, the ascent from say 20m. I would love to see this for some of your dives. Would you mind mailing me some sample xml’s with interesting deco profile?
>
The plot for a deco dive looks about the same, with more noise in the
end part.
//Anton
--
Anton Lundin +46702-161604
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Erich_Giese_depth_vs_gf.png
Type: image/png
Size: 36360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20161210/b1d906fe/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the subsurface
mailing list