New Bug Reports/Feature Requests

[Richard Houser]

When you are looking into the tank editing, would you please try a couple tanks completely from the imperial specs we get from the manufacturers spec sheets?  When I'm shopping for this stuff, I don't typically see water volume measurements.

Examples:

Luxfer AL80 77.4cuft 3000psi (from manufacturer specs online)
XS Scuba HP120 (Faber tank) 120.6cuft 3442psi (confirmed in the dive ship catalogs and online)
LP72 (forget the brand) 65cuft 2250psi (an optional + overfill hydro stamp gets it near 72, hence the name)
Catalina AL80 77.4cuft (from specs online)

Also, when I look up the details on that worthington x8-119 tank, I show 3442 psi ~= 237bar and a volume of 14.8l (though that volume is reseller provided and does not show in the spec sheets over here).  I don't suppose the 200/207 and 230/237 bar discrepancy is a factor either way?

On February 24, 2016 5:16:36 PM EST, Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Linus Torvalds
><torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> So you can add your *specific* cylinder type by editing the tank info
>> details completely. You should be able to (for example), specify your
>> cylinder by editing the cylinder information to be (take a
>Worthington
>> HP119 as an example):
>>
>>  X8-119, 14.4l, 230bar
>
>Ugh. Testign this shows that particularly in imperial mode we're less
>than graceful about adding new cylinder types.
>
>I'm pretty sure it used to work better, but it's been ages since I
>needed to add a specific cylinder, so it could have been this for a
>long time. Probably the whole Qt timeframe.
>
>From some quick testing, bugs I found if you try to create a new
>cylinder type in imperial mode:
>
> - During the editing of a manually added new dive, you don't seem to
>be able to do it at all - only choose from the existing types
>
>   This is an odd bug. I *can* edit the cylinder name in my real
>dives. I'm not sure what the difference is.
>
> - if you pick an existing type without work-pressure (eg a 10 l
>metric bottle), it shows that "10 l" wet-size in cubic feet (0.35
>cuft). It should show it as 10 l because we don't have a workpressure,
>and we just cannot convert to cuft at all.
>
>So our cylinder editing is certainly not without fault.  I'll have to
>think about this.
>
>                 Linus

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20160224/069866d0/attachment.html>