[PATCH] Assign lower number to a merged dive instead of higher one

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Salvador Cuñat <salvador.cunat at gmail.com> wrote:
> At the moment, if we have, say, dives ... 100, 101 and 102 and we merge 101 and
> 102, we get a list numbered ... 99, 100, 102. This is, probably, an
> undesired behavior. The patch simple chooses lower of both dive numbers instead
> of higher one.

Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>

That said, when you start merging dives, you usually do end up having
to renumber subsequent dives anyway, but this is the right thing to do
anyway.

             Linus