Crash Mobile build 758 on Android 5.1.1
rickmwalsh at gmail.com
Sun Jan 31 11:15:21 PST 2016
On 1 Feb 2016 06:07, "Dirk Hohndel" <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Willem Ferguson <
willemferguson at zoology.up.ac.za> wrote:
> > On 31/01/2016 20:49, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >> 1030cb2 is -676
> >> 464b88f is -675
> >> But as Lubomir points out, between different Qt and potentially
different mobile-components, there is some risk that your builds aren't
consistent with mine. Especially when it comes to such odd crashes.
> >> I have actually taken a day off from Subsurface yesterday so I'm not
100% following what you and Willem are tracking down. I can certainly
create specific builds if that would help. Which ones do we need?
> >> /D
> > Rick's rationale is to track down the specific patch that causes the
crash. It is later than build 675 and earlier than 689. So I have been
running various builds of Subsurface-mobile, checking which builds run as
expected and which crash.
> OK, I'm building all the revisions between 675 and 758 one by one and am
putting them all into daily. This will take a while but so will your
testing, so I'm pretty sure I'll be faster than you :-)
> 675 - 679 are already there, a new one is added approximately every
If our build environments are similar enough. The offending commit will be
mine, 1030cb2. Oops. That build (of mine) failed for Willem. The thing is I
thought it was the same as 675, which worked for him.
Can you create a test from the latest master, with that commit reverted?
I think gridlayout is problematic because it isn't supposed to have a set
number of columns. The items should fit in a grid, with as many as fit on
each row. We might be better off with individual row items.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the subsurface