Crash Mobile build 758 on Android 5.1.1

Rick Walsh rickmwalsh at
Sun Jan 31 11:15:21 PST 2016

On 1 Feb 2016 06:07, "Dirk Hohndel" <dirk at> wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Willem Ferguson <
willemferguson at> wrote:
> >
> > On 31/01/2016 20:49, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >> 1030cb2 is -676
> >> 464b88f is -675
> >>
> >> But as Lubomir points out, between different Qt and potentially
different mobile-components, there is some risk that your builds aren't
consistent with mine. Especially when it comes to such odd crashes.
> >>
> >> I have actually taken a day off from Subsurface yesterday so I'm not
100% following what you and Willem are tracking down. I can certainly
create specific builds if that would help. Which ones do we need?
> >>
> >> /D
> >>
> > Rick's rationale is to track down the specific patch that causes the
crash. It is later than build 675 and earlier than 689. So I have been
running various builds of Subsurface-mobile, checking which builds run as
expected and which crash.
> OK, I'm building all the revisions between 675 and 758 one by one and am
putting them all into daily. This will take a while but so will your
testing, so I'm pretty sure I'll be faster than you :-)
> 675 - 679 are already there, a new one is added approximately every
minute :-)

If our build environments are similar enough. The offending commit will be
mine, 1030cb2. Oops. That build (of mine) failed for Willem. The thing is I
thought it was the same as 675, which worked for him.

Can you create a test from the latest master, with that commit reverted?

I think gridlayout is problematic because it isn't supposed to have a set
number of columns. The items should fit in a grid, with as many as fit on
each row. We might be better off with individual row items.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the subsurface mailing list