[PATCH] Re: Two patches for dive plan

Robert Helling helling at atdotde.de
Sun Nov 27 02:35:18 PST 2016


> Am 26.11.2016 um 23:24 schrieb Anton Lundin <glance at acc.umu.se>:
> 
> 
> It depends if i step to +1 from +0 or from +2. Timing issue somewhere?
> Weird numeric instability?

Excellent spot! It first compiled the planner notes before computing the new gradient factors.

Here is a patch.

Best
Robert

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20161127/4e5fcea3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Fix-effective-GFs-in-notes.txt
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20161127/4e5fcea3/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20161127/4e5fcea3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20161127/4e5fcea3/attachment.sig>


More information about the subsurface mailing list