binaries for Beta 1

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:18:37PM +1100, Rick Walsh wrote:
> Hi Dirk,
> 
> On 4 October 2016 at 06:43, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:31:03PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote:
> > > Dear friends,
> > >
> > > > Am 03.10.2016 um 18:06 schrieb Robert C. Helling <
> > robert at euve10195.vserver.de>:
> > > >
> > > > I have three patches on my laptop, one of which is a bugfix.  Will
> > send tonight with proper internet connection. Hold the horses.
> > >
> > > back home, so here we go:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > These three patches are of different character:
> > >
> > > There is no 0001.
> > >
> > > 0002 is something I hacked so I can switch between Buehlmann and VPM-B
> > > from the preferences (rather than just from the planner). It is a bit
> > > rough (and should also grey out those preferences which do not apply to
> > > the active model, to be added later). We should have something like
> > > this, but this patch might need a bit more work and Tomaz promised
> > > something along these lines anyway.
> >
> > So this should wait until after Beta 1?
> >
> 
> If you plan on releasing Beta 1 prior to Tomaz's promised preferences
> patches, can you include note that there are known bugs with pending
> fixes?  E.g. preference to switch between Buhlmann and VPM-B for profile
> display (patch by Robert or Tomaz), and not saving the planner settings (I
> believe there is a pending fix by Tomaz).

No, I'm still waiting for Tomaz to send these patches. Much as I'd like to
get the Beta out, it seems silly not to include fixes that apparently have
already been written and just not sent out, yet.

/D