Problems since last update

[Dirk Hohndel]

I thought we had prohibited GFlow below 30... or something like that. Ah, no, reading the commit it limits it to 10 and GFhigh to 40.
I wonder if there's something that goes wrong with the value '10' there (well, clearly it is).

Stefan, you're the last person to touch that code, would you take a look, please?

/D

> On Dec 18, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Alexander Maier <maieralex at me.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> since the last update the graph is not always correct. Today I planed a dive with GF low 10% and the graph shows 100%. When setting the GF low to 11% (hope to get a correct graph) I get violations. Does anybody know’s why there are problems since the last update?
> 
> 
> 
> --- 
> 
> Alexander Maier
> Wertachstrasse 19
> D-89250 Senden
> 
> Email: maieralex at me.com <mailto:maieralex at me.com>
> Telefon: +49 7307 25364
> Mobil: +49 151 50471677
> 
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20171218/4c07bbae/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GF low.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 541174 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20171218/4c07bbae/attachment-0002.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GF low switch.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 551478 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20171218/4c07bbae/attachment-0003.jpeg>