Subsurface as a Snap?

[Henrik B A]

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:

> Snap and Flatpak both are different takes on what we already have with
> AppImage.
> The goal of AppImage was to have fewer builds to worry about. And it
> brilliantly does that.
> So unless there is something that is a) better and b) completely replaces
> AppImage, I'm
> not sure why we'd spend time on it.
>

It was just a thought.  With Ubuntu (and others) embracing Snap, and with
all major distributions supported, and a central package repository
available, it might reach a larger user base and be easier to support.  I
obviously base this conclusion on absolutely nothing :D

Happy holidays!

Henrik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20171221/3c854d4e/attachment.html>