dirk at hohndel.org
Sat Dec 30 10:27:17 PST 2017
> On Dec 30, 2017, at 10:25 AM, Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 December 2017 at 19:45, Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 30 December 2017 at 19:44, Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 30 December 2017 at 19:08, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
>>>> I just noticed by pure coincidence that apparently a tiny bit of work has gone into Grantlee again (after being seemingly abandoned).
>>>> Is there anything there that we'd want? That would help us?
>>> i see some commits from July 2017, but our build script still does a:
>>> git clone https://github.com/steveire/grantlee.git
>>> git checkout v5.0.0
>>> there is also a fair amount of work since 95d971700 (that's v5.0.0
>>> which is from 2014), yet apart from introducing regressions i don't
>>> see how that would help us.
>>> keeping upstream is nice, but "if it ain't broken, don't fix it" is also nice.
>>> i would go with the former on this one.
>> or rather, i would go with the latter.
> tried building the latest Grantlee against Qt 5.9 and it seems to work
> fine with Subsurface.
> again, i don't think it can help us with any significant bug fixes or
> new features.
That's what I was wondering. In that case, let's stick with v5.0.0
More information about the subsurface