Inconsistencies: Showing planner details in dive list

Robert Helling helling at
Wed Feb 1 06:37:28 PST 2017


> On 01.02.2017, at 14:31, Willem Ferguson <willemferguson at> wrote:
> I suspect the problem is that the dive structure currently only provides for a single set of cylinder definitions and cylinder pressures. There is simply no place to store a second set of such data. The question is whether there is a reasonably do-able approach to display both the dive and its dive plan, or whether we should just abandon this idea and remove all references to such a facility.

I think an easy approach would be as follows: Yes, we only have one set of cylinders per dive, but you don’t have to use all of them, only those with corresponding gas switch events are shown on the profile (I guess, people, please correct me). So when merging a real dive with a planned one, we could put both lists of cylinders in the dive and only use half of them in the events of a specific “dive computer”.

What do you think?


Robert C. Helling     Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
                      Scientific Coordinator
                      Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik
                      Phone: +49 89 2180-4523  Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339

Enhance your privacy, use cryptography! My PGP keys have fingerprints
A9D1 A01D 13A5 31FA 6515  BB44 0820 367C 36BC 0C1D    and
DCED 37B6 251C 7861 270D  5613 95C7 9D32 9A8D 9B8F

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <>

More information about the subsurface mailing list