Inconsistencies: Showing planner details in dive list

[Robert Helling]

Willem,

> On 01 Feb 2017, at 15:37, Robert Helling <helling at atdotde.de> wrote:
> 
> I think an easy approach would be as follows: Yes, we only have one set of cylinders per dive, but you don’t have to use all of them, only those with corresponding gas switch events are shown on the profile (I guess, people, please correct me). So when merging a real dive with a planned one, we could put both lists of cylinders in the dive and only use half of them in the events of a specific “dive computer”.
> 

I have just created a pull request on github. Could you please test it this is what you want?

Thanks
Robert

PS: I have not attacked the „spurious gas changes“ problem you also reported, yet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20170202/ea12af93/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20170202/ea12af93/attachment.sig>