[PATCH 07/12] android-wrapper: Auto accept android sdk license

[Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn]

On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, Anton Lundin wrote:
> On 06 February, 2017 - Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, Anton Lundin wrote:
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Anton Lundin <glance at acc.umu.se>
> > > ---
> > >  packaging/android/android-build-wrapper.sh | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/packaging/android/android-build-wrapper.sh b/packaging/android/android-build-wrapper.sh
> > > index c8dd1e1..6242809 100644
> > > --- a/packaging/android/android-build-wrapper.sh
> > > +++ b/packaging/android/android-build-wrapper.sh
> > > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ if [ ! -d $ANDROID_SDK ] ; then
> > >  	mkdir $ANDROID_SDK
> > >  	pushd $ANDROID_SDK
> > >  	unzip -q ../$SDK_TOOLS
> > > -	bash tools/android update sdk --no-ui -a -t 1,2,3,33
> > > +	( sleep 5 && while true ; do sleep 1; echo y; done ) | bash tools/android update sdk --no-ui -a -t 1,2,3,33
> > 
> > Can it be so that the simplier:
> > 
> > 	yes y | bash tools/android update sdk --no-ui -a -t 1,2,3,33
> > 
> > is all you need?
> 
> Nope. sdk updater does read(0, dest, 1024) or something, so if yes have
> pushed too many y\n into the buffer, it will fail when doing
> strcmp(dest, "y\n") or something alike.
> 
> Thats why odd one here.

I guess you've tested `yes', that's why you know ;)


Cheers,

-- 
Cristian