[PATCH]Re: Deco calculation for repetitive dive - strange effect

Rick Walsh rickmwalsh at gmail.com
Thu Feb 9 23:53:40 PST 2017

On 10 February 2017 at 18:33, Robert C. Helling <robert at euve10195.vserver.de
> wrote:

> Hi,
> > Am 10.02.2017 um 06:26 schrieb Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org>:
> >
> > So, err, should I, or shouldn't I? The discussion left me thinking that
> > VPM-B clearly is even more bogus and weird than I thought before, but I'm
> > not sure we came to a conclusion what to do here...
> I vote for taking this patch. If we err we do on the conservative side.

I second that.  We should also state in the documentation, and maybe
comment in the code, that we reset the crushing pressure between repetitive
dives, which is a conservative assumption but some other implementations do
not do this.

It would be nice to be consistent with other software, but reducing the
decompression time for a repetitive dive just seems dangerous.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20170210/70b9cbd8/attachment.html>

More information about the subsurface mailing list