Subsurface BT test with OSTC

Miika Turkia miika.turkia at gmail.com
Sun Jan 8 00:28:43 PST 2017


The more testing we get before release, the better. Even a small
variation in steps one does might reveal a bug. (Especially the
developers tend to do things always the same way, as they know the
software too well :D)

miika

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Werner Macho <werner.macho at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I also an an OSTC (Sport). If testing with this (BT) is still needed I
> am more than happy to do it.
>
> regards
> Werner
>
> On 07/01/17 21:13, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 7, 2017, at 12:01 PM, Stefan Fuchs <sfuchs at gmx.de
>>> <mailto:sfuchs at gmx.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hallo Dirk,
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 07.01.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Dirk Hohndel:
>>>>
>>>> OK, so that's a USB device, not BT. One of my concerns is our BT
>>>> support - I'm hoping that the newer version of Qt that I switched to
>>>> won't give us any regressions, but of course you never know...
>>>>
>>> I will be able to recruit at least one OSTC (2C?!) BT beta tester.
>>> Wolf (in copy) will test the 4.6 beta 2 tomorrow and give some feedback.
>>
>> Danke, Rolf (und natürlich Stefan). Das ist super!
>>
>> /D
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> subsurface mailing list
>> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
>> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>>
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


More information about the subsurface mailing list