Issues with SAC terminology

Dirk Hohndel dirk at hohndel.org
Tue Jul 18 10:22:59 PDT 2017


> On Jul 18, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Absolutely *everybody* knows what we mean by SAC rate. And the ones
>> that are offended by our use of standard terminology can be offended.
> 
> The takeaway here really is that even the people who have have their
> hangups about this know what we mean, so nobody is ever actively
> confused.

THIS.

We may not use the term that they prefer (AMV, RMV, SGC, SGR, SCR,
I'm sure there are more). But no one can seriously claim to not understand
what Subsurface is giving them under the term SAC.

/D


More information about the subsurface mailing list