Subsurface-mobile Bluetooth download

Anton Lundin glance at acc.umu.se
Mon Jun 5 08:47:15 PDT 2017


On 05 June, 2017 - Dirk Hohndel wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:00:27PM +0200, Joakim Bygdell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have a first generation OSCT3 with BT and it presents it self as "BM+SR
> > > > 3B82"
> > >
> > > We learned from HW that this should never be the case with production
> > > OSTC. Hmm. Not sure what to do here... that's a generic ID for the chip
> > > they used - not sure if it's smart to assume that's an OSTC. But maybe
> > > that's what we should do? Or we need another UI to pick the device...
> > 
> > The "3B82" are the last 4 characters in the device address and as long as
> > there is only one paired device we should be able to match it.
> 
> Yes, that's the default for that chip. So any device with that chip that
> didn't program a different name will show up with this pattern of BT
> name...
> 
> > > > USB download from a OSTC3 works and takes about 2 min, but it does not
> > > work
> > > > from a Suunto Vyper.
> > >
> > > That's interesting. Which phone / device? Which OS? Rooted?
> > >
> > 
> > One+, Cyanogenmod 13
> 
> I bet that doesn't enforce SELinux

It might be SELinux enforcing, but with less strict policies than your
pixel.


Anyway, we're using a non supported api there, so we probably need to
patch that in libusb to.


//Anton


-- 
Anton Lundin	+46702-161604


More information about the subsurface mailing list