Bug: VPMB profile on latest executable

[Stefan Fuchs]

Hallo Robert,

Am 18.06.2017 um 22:01 schrieb Robert Helling:
> Hi,
>
>> On 18. Jun 2017, at 21:31, Stefan Fuchs <sfuchs at gmx.de
>> <mailto:sfuchs at gmx.de>> wrote:
>>
>> Just back from my family holiday...
>> I can reproduce this issue under Windows 10 with a build based on
>> latest master.
>> It behaves exactly as Willem is saying: After Subsurface start the
>> Subsurface generated VPM-B ceiling in the profile for any logged dive
>> is crap. After you once start the planner the result looks different
>> and better but still not 100% sure if it is correct.
>> I somehow have the feeling that the VPM-B calculation is not feed
>> with correct (init) values unless you once start the planner.
>
> didn’t have time to investigate this. But it could be that my recent
> cleaning up the planner patches did the harm. Could you check that by
> undoing those?
>

I did a quick test build:
When using master and reverting commits
https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/commit/b1ccd2fc43a309631ead61465e50d63f76844571
https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/commit/57ee5a5477c92ff4dd7b8975b1866c988556d14e
https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/commit/7b18be2a50e3c94fa1e9ae30c92bbb3eee3593d6
I have the same result as with 4.6.4 release.

So the issue seems to come from these changes.


Best regards
Stefan

-- 

Stefan Fuchs
E-Mail: sfuchs at gmx.de <mailto:sfuchs at gmx.de>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20170619/f37aa469/attachment-0001.html>