Minor formatting comments
John Smith
noseygit at hotmail.com
Mon Mar 13 09:16:30 PDT 2017
Well that's where it needs a community decision.
My view is that we should use GF Hi and GF Lo as that is how they are described in Erik Baker's papers.
As for units, the original paper used 0-1 whereas common use , and in subsurface, is 0-100. I would add % to the preferences comment.
Sent from BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9184>
On 13 Mar 2017, at 05:58, "Martin Měřinský" <mermar at centrum.cz<mailto:mermar at centrum.cz>> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 18:44 +0000, John Smith wrote:
In planning view, gradient factors are "GF low" and "GF high" and are
given % in the pull down.
In preferences they are "GFLow" and "GFHigh" and are unit less.
Which one is correct?
GFLow
GFlow
GF Low
GF low
Martin M.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20170313/9961c246/attachment.html>
More information about the subsurface
mailing list