4.7 - a few questions and requests

Dirk Hohndel dirk at hohndel.org
Sun Oct 15 18:24:19 PDT 2017


On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 08:42:07PM +0200, Stefan Fuchs wrote:
> Hallo Dirk, hallo Robert,
> 
> Am 15.10.2017 um 12:13 schrieb Dirk Hohndel:
> >> Regarding the planner it is the case than still some items are open
> >> including some PRs from my side which need more testing and also some
> >> open issues. But I fully agree with Robert that it doesn't really matter
> >> if we fix/merge this in 4.7 or 4.7.1 or even later.
> > Yes, that's my approach as well. The Beta releases that we used to do
> > really didn't work. Not enough people tested them and we still ended up
> > with quite a few problems in the .0 release. Instead I'm planning to
> > simply do a new point release every week or two until we are happy with
> > what we have.
> Following this plan would it then even be an option to add my open
> planner related PRs for 4.7?
> We all know that for these kind of items I will get almost no feedback
> also not on the mailing list.
> So I would be even happy about complaints coming after we do a 4.7
> release with those changes. At least this would allow me to further
> improve what I did or worst worst case we revert it.

I'll leave that decision to Robert... he maintains the planner.

Robert - pull the planner changes that you want to be in 4.7, please.

/D


More information about the subsurface mailing list