Lubomir I. Ivanov
neolit123 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 28 03:35:34 PST 2018
On 28 February 2018 at 13:23, Long, Martin <martin at longhome.co.uk> wrote:
> I believe it is a simple setting in the manifest. android:installLocation
> which can be either "preferExternal" or "auto" (or not present, to disallow
> moving to SD). I suspect this may have changed.
> However, there are certain types of app which can not/should not be moved to
> SD. It may be that subsurface has started to fall into one of these
i've checked the value in our manifest and it's android:installLocation="auto".
maybe our underlying framework is the cause - Qt.
yet quickly googling about Qt apps that don't work from a SD card i
can't find any results.
> The various reasons can be found here:
"Applications That Should NOT Install on External Storage"
i don't think we fall under that category in terms of our code base.
again, it could be a generic Qt issue.
it's best if you can log an issue in our github if you have an account:
> On 25 February 2018 at 15:43, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
>> I'll admit that I have no idea what gates the ability of an app to be
>> moved to SD card. I don't own any Android devices that support SD card, so I
>> can't even test this...
>> On February 25, 2018 2:58:48 AM PST, paul.e.cole at virgin.net wrote:
>>> I have the Beta version of subsurface mobile on my Samsung tablet. I
>>> had it stored on the SD card. The latest update could not update on the SD
>>> card. I transferred the App to the tablet's memory and updated successfully.
>>> I then tried to transfer the App back to the SD card but wasn't able to.
>>> Paul Cole.
>>> Virus-free. www.avg.com
>> from my phone.
>> subsurface mailing list
>> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
More information about the subsurface