Hashing videos

[Robert Helling]

Hi,

> On 23. May 2018, at 15:23, Berthold Stoeger <bstoeger at mail.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> 
> I fear that any such change would not be backwards-compatible with the current
> hashes. What we could do is for <10 MB files hash all and for >10 MB hash
> filesize + metadata or some such scheme. I hope the <10 MB rule would catch
> nearly all current pictures (we're currently not supporting RAW images, are
> we?).

I don’t think backwards compatibility is any problem at all: At worst, with a new version of hashes we get some cache misses and have to once load the actual file. So startup is slower when first running a new version.

Best
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20180523/36f03068/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20180523/36f03068/attachment-0001.sig>