CNS calculation headaches

[Robert Helling]

Willem,

> On 10. Aug 2019, at 15:19, Robert Helling <helling at atdotde.de> wrote:
> 
> PS: The original problem arose as the interpolated table value is used in the denominator of the cns += formula and would result in a pole when the extrapolated table value reaches 0. Maybe we should redo the whole thing and linearly interpolate the inverses of the table value rather than the table value. For those an extrapolation would be more sensible.

here is another idea: With the exception of the values above pO2 of 1.5bar, a power law is actually a pretty good fit to the table:



This is exp(11.7853 - 0.00193873 pO2).

Maybe, we should give up the idea of the table entirely and use this power law instead?

Best
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20190810/e64a12e3/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 12975 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20190810/e64a12e3/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20190810/e64a12e3/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20190810/e64a12e3/attachment-0001.sig>