GitHub Actions vs Travis builds

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 02:14:06AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> As one would expect, there were a lot of subtle differences in how things
> are set up for the user when compared to Travis, and the documentation
> isn't always as clear as I would have preferred, but I have now managed to
> migrate all of the relevant builds with the exception of iOS to GitHub
> actions. The iOS build is held up by an odd bug where the exact same
> version of Qt fails with the exact same version of Xcode that I use
> locally to do the iOS release builds. Instead of beating my head against
> this one I intend to move iOS to a newer version of Qt again - something
> that takes a good chunk of time in order to assemble the pre-packaged Qt
> in a way that can reasonably quickly be unpacked on the build VM. And that
> latter part of course also requires a fast internet connection, which I
> won't have for the next couple of weeks as I am first on a dive trip and
> then on a business trip. In other words, I expect this one build to stick
> around on Travis for a little longer.
> 
> BTW: if anyone is interest in addressing this, be my guest. I'd be more
> than happy not to be the only one working on this part of our
> infrastructure.

Forget everything I said.
I appear to have an iOS build on GitHub Actions.
I just pushed it to master right before getting on a flight. What could
possibly go wrong.

/D