Is it SmartTrak, Smartrak, or Smarttrack or...

[Dirk Hohndel]

Salva,

Would it make sense to try to clean this up everywhere - or is this just legacy and not worth the effort?

/D

> On Feb 20, 2023, at 11:12, Salvador Cuñat <salvador.cunat at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dirk.
> 
> SmartTrak is the correct spelling for the software. That was my fault from the very beginning, as I even misspelled the name in the code files.
> 
> Btw, LogTrak is the new (well, not that new) divelog from Scubapro. Java based and using HSQLDB to create on the fly databases, completely different format.
> 
> I have an importer for LogTrak too (and another for the ASD binary format used by Scubapro's softwares to import/export) but never find time to put them in line with Subsurface's master and send a PR. Probably in the next weeks will have some time to end this work and send a PR once you have cut the current planned release.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> Salva.
> 
> 
> El lun., 20 feb. 2023 18:49, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org <mailto:dirk at hohndel.org>> escribió:
>> I noticed that we are a wee bit inconsistent in how we spell this thing.
>> Mind you, it seems the vendor has abandoned it in favor of LogTrak (and I'm not sure if that uses the same format), but a translator pointed out that apparently it should be spelled with two 't's and we in most places spell it with one...
>> 
>> Salva, what's the official word on this? :)
>> 
>> /D

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20230220/eae6d7ce/attachment.htm>