<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:45 PM, Benjamin <<a href="mailto:nystire@gmail.com" class="">nystire@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><p dir="ltr" class="">Theoretically, if I were to unpack the static Ubuntu version on a Fedora system and try to run it, what should I expect to see? (At work now, but trying to line up this evenings, job card before somebody else fills it for me)</p>
</div></blockquote></div>(is there a chance that you could stop top-posting?)<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The Ubuntu package has only a handful of libraries statically linked. All of Qt, XML, XSLT, libc… are all still dynamic.</div><div class="">So first one would have to link those statically as well (at least Qt, XML, XSLT, etc)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I haven’t looked into that, yet. It’s Marble, libgit2 and libdivecomputer that are causing the packaging problems - which is why those are the ones I’m linking statically on Ubuntu.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I just pushed a Qt5 build but apparently I messed something up there with Marble - at least Miika is reporting problems.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I’ll be traveling for the rest of the week, so I may be slow to update this.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">/D</div></body></html>