<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:neolit123@gmail.com" target="_blank">neolit123@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><div class="h5"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">OSX does something very similar to an AppImage, i think.</span><br></div></div>
and i have no idea how they handle the whole huge CAD updater scenario<br>
that i'm proposing...they probably don't handle that very well.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>OSX uses app folders (not compressed images), so people can change whatever they want if they so desire:</div><div><br>$ find /Applications/Subsurface.app<br>/Applications/Subsurface.app<br>/Applications/Subsurface.app/Contents/Frameworks/libgit2.23.dylib<br>/Applications/Subsurface.app/Contents/Frameworks/libGrantlee_Templates.5.dylib</div><div>...<br>/Applications/Subsurface.app/Contents/MacOS/Subsurface<br>...</div><div><p class="">However, I strongly believe that any user changes to our distribution (templates etc)  should stay separate from the app image.  Maybe in $HOME/.subsurface?   We'll create a lot of pain for ourselves using a RW app image, I think.<br></p><p class="">Henrik</p></div></div></div></div>