<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Rick,<div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Am 24.05.2016 um 01:13 schrieb Rick Walsh <<a href="mailto:rickmwalsh@gmail.com" class="">rickmwalsh@gmail.com</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">On another point, I thought it might be worth printing below the output table the maximum equivalent narcotic depth for any trimix dive.</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div><div class="">Maybe that is the best option: Add two columns to the gas table, one with depth for which it is the best mix (O2-wise) and one with the depth that has an END of 30m (or the corresponding depth value). And the user can enter values there which change the percentages. And she can enter a special character (? or * for example) and that has the meaning of „max depth of the dive“ resp. gas change depth (if that is smaller than max depth).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">What do you think? I would think we can afford the additional space for those columns.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Best</div><div class="">Robert</div></body></html>