<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail-moz-cite-prefix">On 17/10/2016 18:07, Robert Helling wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">Willem,
<div class="gmail-"><br class="gmail-"><div><blockquote class="gmail-" type="cite"><div class="gmail-">Am 17.10.2016 um 15:34 schrieb Willem Ferguson <<a class="gmail-" href="mailto:willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za">willemferguson@zoology.up.ac.za</a>>:</div><br class="gmail-Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="gmail-"><span class="gmail-" style="font-family:helvetica;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;float:none;display:inline">What happens if the user has selected VPM-B as a deco algorithm? Are there any differences in the calculation of the heat map?</span></div></blockquote></div><br class="gmail-"></div>
<div class="gmail-">The heat map should not change when you change the
decompression algorithm. The whole point of it is that it provides a
visual impression that you can use to compare algorithms. Therefore
making it algorithm dependent would mean moving the goal posts. </div>
<div class="gmail-"><br class="gmail-"></div>
<div class="gmail-">The heat map only depends on the inert gas partial
pressures in the different compartments. And both algorithms agree on
that part.</div>
<div class="gmail-"><br class="gmail-"></div>
<div class="gmail-">That said, due to a bug (you found that as well), it
changed since some of the data was not properly initialized when in
amp-b mode. But that should be fixed by now. (BTW: That but had also
affected the old tissue saturation plot for vpm-b but there, nobody
noticed…).</div>
<div class="gmail-"><br class="gmail-"></div>
<div class="gmail-">Best</div>
<div class="gmail-">Robert</div>
</blockquote>
Excellent Robert, thank you. I was not sure whether a critical bubble
radius was used as a limiting yardstick. The reason I asked is because
the upper group of colours are calculated as a proportion of the
M-value, which is a Bühlmann (or more correctly a Workman) approach. Is
this correct at all?<br>
Kind regards,<br>
willem<br>
<br>
</div>