<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 6 February 2017 at 08:29, Stefan Fuchs <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sfuchs@gmx.de" target="_blank">sfuchs@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Hello Robert, hi All,</p>
<p>I again see one strange effect in deco calculation of repetitive
dives. I thought it may be linked to the surface time issue Robert
fixed a few days ago but this is still there after the patch.</p>
<p>Please check the attached file and try to do the following:</p>
<p>- For dive 1002 do Log -> Edit dive in planner<br>
- Delete all planner points after 2nd with Ctrl-leftclick<br>
- With my settings (screenshot below) you will have a runtime of
51min, surface time is correct: 47:30h<br>
- Now change the date/time when the dive is planned to 1h later
(3.01.2017, 14:00h)<br>
- No the dive is not considered to be a repetitive dive any more
because surface time is >48h -> ok<br>
- But now runtime is 58min, deco is much longer ??!<br>
- BTW: This does not happen with some other scenarios I tested
with deco dives with air/TX,... Maybe it has <a href="http://s.th" target="_blank">s.th</a>. to do with dive
1001 setup which is a little bit more special using the Tx50/15
for ascent until 15m and having the real bottom gas specified as
second gas?! <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Would be great if you could look into this as well! Thanks!</p>
<p><br></p></div></blockquote><div>I'm away from my own computer and won't have time to look into this properly, at least until next week, but I can confirm the problem (with Windows daily, 4.6.0-53-ga959e437a99e). I noticed that the total runtime remains constant at 51min for any surface interval <48hr. Even with dive time set to 1 Jan, 13:40, which is surface interval of 10min, the runtime is 51min.<br><br></div><div>Dive 1001 doesn't look particularly unusual to me.<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><p>
</p>
<p>One other note: Would it be possible to also add a collision
detection when planning a dive at the very same time of another
existing dive in the planner? This today gives no warning but
planner results are incorrect.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Best regards<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Stefan<br>
</font></span></p><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<br>
<div class="m_-5789042107076915665moz-signature">-- <br>
<p>Stefan Fuchs<br>
E-Mail: <a href="mailto:sfuchs@gmx.de" target="_blank">sfuchs@gmx.de</a></p>
</div>
</font></span></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
subsurface mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org">subsurface@subsurface-divelog.<wbr>org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.subsurface-<wbr>divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/subsurface</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>