<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi,<div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 09 Feb 2017, at 21:50, Stefan Fuchs <<a href="mailto:sfuchs@gmx.de" class="">sfuchs@gmx.de</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">1. VPlanner in some way also gives you a bonus (shorter deco) when doing the second dive as a repetitive dive but in a different way.</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div><div class="">in the last paragraph of the Baker notes that Rick quoted he actually sells this as a feature of VPM-B: Thanks to the recompression of the bubbles, their effect is less severe (I doubt I believe this conclusion). He gives a reference for this in terms of two names and a year (without more bibliographical detail) and google scholar indeed lists a paper that fits these names and year. But I find it unlikely that it contains the result he claims it contains. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Best</div><div class="">Robert</div></body></html>