<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 21, 2017, at 1:30 AM, Henrik B A <<a href="mailto:henrik@synth.no" class="">henrik@synth.no</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Has anyone looked into how feasible it would be to build Subsurface as a Snap? It would be an alternative to the AppImage.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Ref. <a href="https://docs.snapcraft.io/build-snaps/c" class="">https://docs.snapcraft.io/build-snaps/c</a></div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>Snap and Flatpak both are different takes on what we already have with AppImage.</div><div>The goal of AppImage was to have fewer builds to worry about. And it brilliantly does that.</div><div>So unless there is something that is a) better and b) completely replaces AppImage, I'm </div><div>not sure why we'd spend time on it.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>The share of Linux users in our overall user base has been declining for years. Admittedly,</div><div>my data there is not necessarily correct as it relies on connections to the update server,</div><div>but I think it's a reasonable indication of rough orders of magnitude.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>/D</div><br class=""></body></html>