<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 24, 2019, at 4:00 AM, Henrik B A <<a href="mailto:henrik@synth.no" class="">henrik@synth.no</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 6:32 PM Dirk Hohndel <<a href="mailto:dirk@hohndel.org" class="">dirk@hohndel.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word" class="">I believe Henrik's proposal pre-dated us adding the country field. I see no reason to remove the country field.</div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">No, my initial propose had Site name, Location and Country. But I got so much opposition from even mentioning anything resembling a taxonomy, so my proposal (that you pasted in the OP) is stripped down dive site database proposal with only Site name & GPS. It is a bare bones thing that all other fanciness could build upon :)</div></div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>Hrmpf. More apologizing for me to do, I guess. I can be rather difficult when I dig down...</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Sorry again. I find 'country' useful. The further down you go with taxonomy, the trickier it gets. But I'm certainly willing to reopen that conversation as well.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>/D</div><br class=""></body></html>