<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Unfortunately the images are too small / too compressed for me to be able to read the numbers.<div class="">Maybe you could send full resolution screenshots to Robert (as he is the master of all things "Planner")?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">From a visual impression of course the obvious thing is that the Windows user has "calculated ceiling in 3m increments" set, while the Mac users doesn't, but since for the Mac picture I can't even read the GF, there's not much else I can say here.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">/D</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">PS: no, please don't send full size screenshots to the mailing list (the email would likely be stuck in moderation, we have a 2MB mail limit) - but something like a 1200x700 might be large enough to be readable?<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 11, 2020, at 7:20 AM, Attilla de Groot via subsurface <<a href="mailto:subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org" class="">subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi All,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Together with a buddy I was planning a (short) deco dive. He is using Subsurface on Windows and I am on my Mac. We were working on a remote session and found that the results of deco time, stops etc. were not that same when using the same settings.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I have attached two screenshots where we tried to change the GF to get similar results in both environments (no, we didn’t make the dive like that). We got quite close, but in either case it looks that there is something not the same in the dive planning functions between Windows and OS X.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I was wondering if this has been seen before and if there is something that we might have done wrong on our end.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Best regards,</div><div class="">Attilla</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><img apple-inline="yes" id="09183C23-4FFC-4289-825B-9FBAC1864A4F" class="" src="cid:DB7CA519-1239-4099-B353-2BB30280B42E"><img apple-inline="yes" id="9B33CDCB-C374-4070-BD40-B10B61FE3A37" class="" src="cid:812A4D45-DF01-4FB0-B778-45FB2540C10F"></div></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">subsurface mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org" class="">subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org</a><br class="">http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>