<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Attilla,<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 11. May 2020, at 16:20, Attilla de Groot via subsurface <<a href="mailto:subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org" class="">subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;">Together with a buddy I was planning a (short) deco dive. He is using Subsurface on Windows and I am on my Mac. We were working on a remote session and found that the results of deco time, stops etc. were not that same when using the same settings.</div><div class="" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;"><br class=""></div><div class="" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;">I have attached two screenshots where we tried to change the GF to get similar results in both environments (no, we didn’t make the dive like that). We got quite close, but in either case it looks that there is something not the same in the dive planning functions between Windows and OS X.</div><div class="" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;"><br class=""></div><div class="" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;">I was wondering if this has been seen before and if there is something that we might have done wrong on our end.</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">unfortunately, the images you attached don’t have enough resolution to be able to read anything. Assuming you have all settings identical (including those in the preferences), the only reason there could be a difference is that the planner takes dives in you logbook into account (if they are closer than 48 hours to your planned dive). Both versions of the program use th identical code in the planner, so I cannot see how the difference comes about (apart from an actual bug that leads to unpredicted behaviour.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Best</div><div class="">Robert</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>