<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#322d3b" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/02/2022 01:26, Dirk Hohndel via
subsurface wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:972BC685-D51E-4037-BB08-5EEC2AA143B4@hohndel.org">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>Well, maybe not. The options are "anyone can edit a wiki
page" (sorry, been there, done that, HECK NO), or "the same
group of users that can edit the wiki also have push access to
the repo" (sorry, that's an idiotic equivalency). So I'm afraid
the access control for wikis on GitHub is just not at the level
that I'd need to be comfortable with this.<br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
Don't know if it affects your thinking, but "anyone" in this case
means "anyone with a github account". Github have some pretty
aggressive spambots that police accounts, so it's not <i>quite</i>
like letting the kiddies in with their crayons.<br>
<br>
Anyway, perhaps crowd-sourcing support is not the right way to go.
The user community is pretty small, after all, and may not be able
to contribute at a high enough level. For most people Subsurface
"just works", and if it doesn't, they wander off.<br>
<br>
C.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature"><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>