<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 13, 2022, at 10:22 AM, Linus Torvalds <<a href="mailto:torvalds@linux-foundation.org" class="">torvalds@linux-foundation.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 7:53 PM Dirk Hohndel <<a href="mailto:dirk@hohndel.org" class="">dirk@hohndel.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">/usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file /builddir/build/BUILD/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.15.3/.package_note-qt5-qtbase-5.15.3-2.fc36.x86_64.ld: No such file or directory<br class=""><br class="">Hey Linus - is this something that you see, too?<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Just checked, and yes.<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">The hack around this that I found and then forgot is hidden in packaging/copr/subsurface.spec:<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Removing that package_not works for me too. No idea what/why/how it<br class="">gets generated.<br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There are LONG discussion threads on the Fedora bugzilla how this is this super cool thing that allows you to do super important things and how it's totally ok that this breaks stuff because it's super cool.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">OK, I may be paraphrasing slightly - but that's pretty much what I took away from them.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">You'll see bugs like this <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055863" class="">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055863</a> which say "oh well" and then nothing happens.</div><div class="">And stuff like this <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043178" class="">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043178</a> that says "oh, we fixed it for this specific package by hacking around it".</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">But what I haven't found, yet, is something that explains why I want these package_notes and why Fedora 36 enabled them even though it breaks so many things...</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">/D</div></body></html>