subsurface issue tracking

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 15:54 +0200, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen wrote:
> > Den 07.09.12 15:48, skrev Dirk Hohndel:
> > > On Sep 7, 2012, at 6:25 AM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> > >
> > >> hi,
> > >>
> > >> people with more than one project on their heads can often forget what
> > >> has to be done...
> > >>
> > >> would it be a good idea to enable an "issue tracker" somewhere ?
> > >> github has one, which looks modern and pretty, but i haven't tried it much.
> > >> it probably would suffice.
> > > I think Linus is not a huge fan of the way github does things.
> > > I really don't want to implement a bugzilla instance, but let me look around if there is something nice and easy that I can do.
> > > It's definitely a good idea.
> > 
> > How about we create a subsurface organization on Github: 
> > https://github.com/account/organizations/new, and host the mainline code 
> > & issues from there?  It's free for OS projects.
> > 
> > That way others could manage the issues as well.
> 
> Surely is one option but clearly not the most free (as in FOSS not $).

One that looks *a lot* like github is gitlab: http://gitlabhq.com/
It is written in ruby though, so according to the server my be
annoying/a blocker.

After there is always trac or roundup in python or mantis in php (I
won't mention bugzilla (perl) since it has already been
mentio^rejected).

Dirk do you have any preferences ?

Pierre