source code may be getting a bit intimidating
Dirk Hohndel
dirk at hohndel.org
Mon Jan 7 08:17:08 PST 2013
Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> writes:
>> However, it looks like it doesn't generate gas-change events? Also, I
>> seem to not be able to go shallower. I tried to enter
>>
>> 150 +5 20/30
>> 150 +5 20/30
>> 100 +5 20/30
>> 100 +1 40
>>
>> and it works as a profile, but the gas seems to be very confused.
>
> Yes, there are some serious shortcomings still there. I'm surprised you
> can't go up at all - that used to work for me (but I didn't test it with the
> very last version, I guess).
Yes, you can indeed go shallower, the problem was the relative times...
>> Also, it turns out that the "+5" syntax doesn't work any more, and I
>> had to change it to be absolute time (so 5, 10, 15, 16 instead of the
>> +5's/+1). But the nice thing about it was that the profile BUI now
>> *showed* me what the problem was.
>
> What? That definitely worked. Dang.
Yes, it worked in the final assembly of the plan, but not in the
interactive one. The code just wasn't there. Oops.
Fixed and pushed.
/D
More information about the subsurface
mailing list