source code may be getting a bit intimidating

Dirk Hohndel dirk at
Mon Jan 7 08:17:08 PST 2013

Dirk Hohndel <dirk at> writes:
>> However, it looks like it doesn't generate gas-change events? Also, I
>> seem to not be able to go shallower. I tried to enter
>>  150 +5 20/30
>>  150 +5 20/30
>>  100 +5 20/30
>>  100 +1 40
>> and it works as a profile, but the gas seems to be very confused.
> Yes, there are some serious shortcomings still there. I'm surprised you 
> can't go up at all - that used to work for me (but I didn't test it with the 
> very last version, I guess).

Yes, you can indeed go shallower, the problem was the relative times...

>> Also, it turns out that the "+5" syntax doesn't work any more, and I
>> had to change it to be absolute time (so 5, 10, 15, 16 instead of the
>> +5's/+1). But the nice thing about it was that the profile BUI now
>> *showed* me what the problem was.
> What? That definitely worked. Dang.

Yes, it worked in the final assembly of the plan, but not in the
interactive one. The code just wasn't there. Oops.

Fixed and pushed.


More information about the subsurface mailing list