Patch to support libmarblewidget-qt5

[Rex Dieter]

Dirk Hohndel wrote:


> For that reason we have our own fork of Marble from which we build a much
> smaller custom libssrfmarblewidget... Subsurface 4.5 will require that
> library and has it's name hardcoded. Of course, Subsurface being open
> source a determined maintainer could easily work around that :-)
> 
> Similarly, we have our own version of libdivecomputer that includes some
> changes that upstream wasn't ready to take and that improve the user
> experience. We document that behavior in our user manual and it's
> confusing to the user if this isn't what happens.

thanks.

These are good reasons to justify fedora packaging use the bundled 
components then.  I'll see if I can help make that happen.  If successful, 
would that mean you'd withdraw your request that fedora not ship subsurface?

-- rex