[PATCH 3/3] VPM-B: Add more planner tests

Miika Turkia miika.turkia at gmail.com
Tue Aug 25 07:47:51 PDT 2015


On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 26 August 2015 at 00:33, Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add more VPM-B planner tests.  The "expected" total run time is taken as
>> the
>> total run time produced by the Fortran VPM-B program.  For all these
>> tests, the
>> results are within two minutes, which is a good result, but most are
>> classified
>> as a "fail".
>>
>
> It would be helpful if we could consider a result close to our benchmark as
> a pass, and show the difference.  But I don't know how to do that.  For
> example, we could consider +/- (1% + 1 minute) a pass.

Would this help?
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtest.html#QVERIFY

miika


More information about the subsurface mailing list