More Location Fixes.

[Davide DB]

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
>
> And like it or not, our preferences do matter a bit
> here.

Absolutely unnecessary statement.
I'm not trying to impose my view but just contributing with my view
for the sake of a better application.


>> BRANCH #FIVE
>>
>> 1. empty location field
>> 1.2. GPS data (e.g. from Subsurface web service - dive site with no name)
>> 1.2.1. user types in name, picks one of the completions
>> 1.2.1.1 completion has GPS data
>> 1.2.1.1.2 completion GPS is different from the incoming GPS data
>>
>> Hummmm
>>

This one?

> I did notice that in all the cases above you forgot about the a)/b)
> (accept/reject). In most cases that's kinda obvious (just discard).
> And I think even in the cases where this would have created a new dive
> site we just discard it.
>
> For now I think the simplest logic would be to assume that all changes
> made go away and we are exactly in the same state as before this edit
> operation started.

This was my intention. For the sake of simplicity



-- 
Davide
https://vimeo.com/bocio/videos