transalation - dive site geo lookup

Rick Walsh rickmwalsh at gmail.com
Mon Oct 5 13:31:30 PDT 2015


On 6 Oct 2015 07:17, "Dirk Hohndel" <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 10:09:49PM +0200, Krzysztof Arentowicz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could someone give me an explanation how dive site geo lookup options
work?
> >
> > "Enable geocoding for dive site management"
> > "Parse site without GPS data"
> > "Same format for existing dives"
> >
> > I have no idea what they do and it makes translating somewhat difficult.
> > These options are not covered in user's manual.
>
> Yes, Willem struggles with the concepts as well.
>
> I am actually considering (yes, I know, crazy) to remove these options
> because they fundamentally seem redundant as they describe a feature that
> is not yet fully implemented.
>
> The first one ("Enable geocoding") should be selfexplanatory... it turns
> on support for geocoding. But frankly, why do we need this? It no longer
> happens automatically, the user has to trigger it per dive site. So the
> preference setting is redundant.
>
> And the other two ("Parse site without GPS data" and "Same format for
> existing dives") both refer to things that we didn't have anyone
> implementing (I ran out of time and energy).
>
> So my suggestion is that I simply comment out that preferences page and we
> always enable the geocoding option.
>
> Comments, thoughts?
>
What about geocode format?  I think we need to keep that preference.
Country/State/Town works well in Australia, but I'm not sure how it would
work for countries without separate states.

> /D
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20151006/c7314b0b/attachment.html>


More information about the subsurface mailing list