[PATCH] WIP: use kirigami plugin instead of embedding in qrc

[Tomaz Canabrava]

ECM shouldn't depend on anything as it is just cmake modules. If it
depends, it's a bug on the package. Same thing goes for kirigami, as it's
just qml files that shouldn't depend on anything else. I'd mark that as
packaging bug too. Also kf5 activities shouldn't depend on the whole kf5.

We already know how broken the Linux packaging system is, I blame this on
that.

Tomaz
Em 5 de mai de 2016 15:04, "Dirk Hohndel" <dirk at hohndel.org> escreveu:

>
> > On May 5, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On May 5, 2016, at 10:07 AM, Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday 05 May 2016 09:26:50 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >>> In that context, is there a plugin, yet, with which I could test this?
> >>> I looked at Kirigami master this morning and didn't see any sign of
> >>> such a dependency, but maybe you are holding that back, waiting
> >>> for us to get our act together?
> >>
> >> the plugin atm is there but dummy (src/kirigamiplugin.cpp), didn't add
> other
> >> things in there so far, as wouldn't be possible to use them.
> >>
> >> it should already be possible to see if it gets correctly packaged,
> since the
> >> qmldir includes it, an import org.kde.kirigami would fail if the plugin
> is not
> >> there
> >>
> >> to move further to me is important to know if is easy enough to deploy,
> as i
> >> wouldn't move in a direction that makes things too hard for who is
> using it
> >
> > I'm sure we can figure this out - I'll make playing with this a priority
> and
> > will report back :-)
>
> So Kirigami requires ECM. and KF5Plasma. and that requires KF5Activities.
> Which requires Boost. And KF5.
>
> I think at this point we need to talk about scope.
>
> No, it is not reasonable to assume that I want to build all of KDE just
> because I want to use Kirigami. Either the requirements in the
> CMakeLists.txt file are too broad and none of this is actually needed, or
> this may be the point where Subsurface needs to decide if building on top
> of Kirigami and there for apparently all of KF5 is the way we want to go.
>
>
> /D
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20160505/876c8bf1/attachment.html>