Facebook integration - I'm considering to completely remove this feature

[Monty Taylor]

On 1/31/19 8:58 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> So Facebook just triggered a review of our Facebook integration (because the best
> way to deal with the fact that you are selling out the privacy of your users is to... never
> mind... I'm sure this makes sense).
> 
> Our app failed every step of their review, likely because they have no bleeping idea
> what the app does as it doesn't match what people usually do with apps? not sure.
> But the results that they sent to me make no sense whatsoever.
> 
> I will follow up with them because this whole thing bugs me, but fundamentally I don't
> think this is worth it and instead I'm considering to simply remove this feature from
> Subsurface 4.9.
> 
> Comments, concerns?

I think it's not worth the pain. Its existence has always implied to me 
that perhaps subsurface would expand "share on" to include twitter 
and/or instagram (and/or I suppose snapshat?) That seems like a lot to 
chase.

Personally I've taken to syncing with divelogs.de. They've got 
tweet/google+/facebook sharing links - and interfacing with things like 
that seems more like their kind of thing. (or other websites like them - 
like if diviac or any of the other online logbooks grew reasonable 
upload/sync apis)

I vote kill it - for whatever my vote might be worth.