deco calculations

[Robert C. Helling]

On Jan 4, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Robert C. Helling wrote:

> But I ran it with data from my latest dive on which it seems to think I violated the ceiling which results in the ceiling being a self-intersecting surface, see screen-shot attached.
> 


Adding a ceiling of 0 at the end of the dive fixes this, see attached patch. 

BTW, shouldn't a violated ceiling be highlighted?

Best
Robert

--                                                                              
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO 
Robert C. Helling     Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics  
                      Scientific Coordinator                                   
                      Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik    
print "Just another   Phone: +49 89 2180-4523  Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339       
    stupid .sig\n";   http://www.atdotde.de 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130104/1ec88e56/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: close_ceiling.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 332 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130104/1ec88e56/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130104/1ec88e56/attachment-0001.html>