CMake vs Qmake [was: [PATCH 3/3] Cmake build now contains icons]

Henrik Brautaset Aronsen subsurface at henrik.synth.no
Tue Feb 24 00:47:00 PST 2015


On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Patrick Valsecchi <patrick at thus.ch> wrote:

>
> We really should choose between qmake and cmake. I wouldn't care about
> cmake if qmake was building the UTs...
>

I just realized that IntelliJ's very promising CLion IDE [1] use CMake as
its native build system.  That should make it quick to get up to speed
there.

I use IntelliJ IDEA for other things (mostly Java), and I'm very happy with
it.  I don't see why we can't support both build systems, though, if it
makes people happy :)

Henrik

[1] https://www.jetbrains.com/clion/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150224/a8bde1c9/attachment.html>


More information about the subsurface mailing list